 |
| Photo, "Woman Climbing Rock" by olovedog, courtesy of www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
At a time when you least think that the going can't get any tougher, it can. Not insurmountably tough, but there's no point dressing it up in finery. Gaining Chartership is a testing experience. It is a test of academic ability, intellectual ability, resourcefulness, creativity, stamina, and, not least, resilience. The submission of completed exemplars is one of those areas where more than just your ability to gather the evidence necessary to prove you're meeting the standard and string it into words is being tested. Putting together the submission means applying a multitude of skills, and just as you are beginning to breathe a sigh of relief at having done as much as you thought was necessary to complete everything, the submission comes back at you with stern comments on what you didn't quite get right, or you didn't get right enough. This is where resilience and determination kick in.
 |
| Photo "Don't Give Up" by Stuart Miles, courtesy of www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
Firstly, I just want to spend a bit of time reflecting on those fine points of detail in making your submission that can affect how it is received. You need to ensure that there is nothing confidential that can be identified in any way - there is no option but to be extremely thorough about this. Just this point alone speaks volume about a trainee's professionalism. Either remove identities or blank these out. If posters advertising training events you are delivering are to be used as evidence, any traces of any identities must be removed e.g. photos. I'm sure there are readers who will contemplate, as I did, just how reliable evidence that has had all identity wiped clean can be, but it is something that must simply be done. A submission must be sent in duplicate hard copies as well as through an electronic version - the precise details as well as details of what must be signed by your supervisor is on the DFP site. It is important to make sure you have original signatures because electronic signatures will not be accepted.
Then you wait for the submission to be returned and you will feel varying degrees of confidence almost day by day. Recieving feedback can be difficult, and this is where resilience kicks in. The first thing you focus on is whether competence has been demonstrated. Perhaps it has and you will feel a welter of relief. That's great. More commonly, your first attempt - or indeed, early attempts - at submissions will come back with the glaringly harsh comment: "competence not yet demonstrated".
At first impact the chances are you will move along a spectrum of emotions from outrage, to deep disappointment, to despondency, through despair, and then to grudging acceptance that something was not quite right with it. I suggest putting it down, brewing a cup of tea and coming back to it once the weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth is over. Then read it through again because you may find, once you read it all through, that you have passed all but one or two of the competencies, and then, there may just be some minor issues you have overlooked. Feedback is there to provide you with a chance to improve that little bit more, to stretch youself those last few inches to reach the summit of your training, so it is worth making the most of it.
Assessors tend to give detailed feedback. Some may be more prescriptive in what they want you to submit and others less so. Once you have read through the feedback, discuss this with your supervisor so that you decide together what is going to be resubmitted in order to cover all the points. Then you are up and running again.
 |
| Photo "Male Runner on Starting Blocks" by stockimages, courtesy of www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
Most trainees do not pass their first submission. But after five or more years working on this, not quite demonstrating competence is a difficult judgement to receive and accept. In fact, when faced with having to rework a project that was completed perhaps a year or more previously, perhaps with a different employer, perhaps in a different part of the country, the task may seem completely impossible. However, it is very rare for an assessor to want a submission completely reworked. Usually there is a detail that is missing or needs further clarification or greater reflection. Perhaps your practice diary may not be clear or a reference to a piece of evidence may be missing. Most resubmissions are usually in the form of an additional report to demonstrate a very specific piece of learning, or perhaps another reflective piece, or new practice diary entries to show that you went over your statistical analysis and are content that you chose the right one, for example. Breaking down the feedback and requirements of resubmission into its component parts will make the pill much less bitter to swallow, and the final stretch will appear that bit shorter.
What may be worth pointing out is that assessors vary in what they like and don't like to see in submissions. Some will compliment trainees on their reflective diaries, some may like a very formal approach, others will want a good deal of supporting evidence while others are less demanding as to quantity. The best way of dealing with this is to make sure you have unfailingly followed the guidelines and that you have made clear anything that you are not sure about with the registrar.
For many trainees, dealing with some negative feedback and having to do yet more work before reaching the finishing post can be very disheartening. I have written this from the perspective of someone who has to resubmit some work and I understand intimately the range of emotions that this sparks off. But proving your professionalism and capabitlities is more than what you put on paper. It is about taking the knocks, working with them, learning from them, shaking off the hurt and taking those next steps to achieving your goal. Success is in sight.
 |
| Photo "Young Girl Rejoicing" by stockimages, courtesy of www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
